I believe that cognition need be complete, you may not acclaim to cognitize if cognizant of ninety-nine out of a hundred. For you do not cognitize.
You have attempted, and bravo for the attempt but have not achieved cognition. Therefore how can we rightly act? We act but not with fullness of right, we act largely on the probability of being more oft in the right, then in that wrong...
Yet often we allude this one instance be omitted from our logical equations, ever taking place in our subconscious the factoring of that which we render conscious.
with intelligence being primarily cognition and the resulting response, that which hinders these fundamental and essential intellectual deductions(probability) are in direct opposition to that which we must attain.
for though i admit there are those who seem pleased, and perhaps are so pleased to wallow in a state of mindlessness" and myopia. I believe that the majority of us seek clarity to that which puzzles us, seek answers to unanswered questions, seek to know the why not just the deductible how.
So what is it that most often clouds our view and permits us to be amusement to others so like minded?
The self... to be more precise Ourselves! The us, the we, yes above all the me.
Standing resolutely at times stubbornly in the path we are so desirous to trod... So simply we must trod upon the one, remove the IT from a place of reverence least it be our fall.
That Erroneous must be replaced, no cost should be too high.
I am not ashamed to admit i am wrong, for i am only more knowledgeable than i was yesterday.
No comments:
Post a Comment